Response to technical innovation in peasant society: a case study of peasants’ response to the introduction of improved maize seed varieties in Handeni district

The study was conducted in Handeni district in Tanzania to assess peasants’ response to the introduction of improved varieties of maize. It was conducted on March, 2007 in four villages of Kwamatuku, Kwedibangala, Kwedibago and Komkonga where 140 respondents were interviewed. The study used the modernization theory and it focused on modernity at the individual level, as the values, beliefs, and motivations of people are considered to be influencing their response toward the use of improved maize varieties. It also used the adoption process, using the innovation-decision model; whereby individuals (peasants) were assessed in four stages of adoption. The data were collected through qualitative and quantitative techniques which included documentary analysis, in-depth interview, focus group discussions, and structured interviews. The quantitative data were analyzed using the Statistical Package for Social Sciences (SPSS) computer program. The study found that 84.9 per cent of the respondents were aware of the improved maize seed varieties. Radio, village council, extension staff, and friends/neighbours were found to be the main sources of technical information. It was also found that, although they obtain information from different sources, the reliable source of technical innovation was found to be from village leaders and meetings. In this study, among other things, the main reasons for adoption of the technology include high yielding capacity and early maturation of the varieties, as 42.2 percent of the respondents explained. The study also found that the main reasons for rejection of the seeds were poor storage strength, and the increased cost of production, by 35.7 and 10 percent respectively. On the other hand, availability of improved seeds and local beliefs were found to influence the adoption of improved maize seeds. Conclusively, policy makers and local leaders should be involved in technology development and transfer. On other hand, technology should be available and practicable to the people. Lastly, the social aspect of the people should not be ignored during technology transfer.