Community empowerment and accountability in rural primary health care The case of Kasulu District in Tanzania

dc.contributor.authorDamian, Respicius Shumbusho
dc.date.accessioned2022-05-12T10:17:19Z
dc.date.available2022-05-12T10:17:19Z
dc.date.issued2018
dc.descriptionAvailable in print form, Eat Africana Collection, Dr. Wilbert Chagula Library,( THS EAF RA427.9.T34D354)en_US
dc.description.abstractThe study investigated the relationship between empowerment and community based accountability in rural primary Health Care. The focus was on empowerment attributes among community members existing legal and institutional frameworks, the management of the community health fund, and the role of health facility governance committees in kasulu district. The study employed a mixed method approach that included both quantitative and qualitative data collection and analysis methods. The study found that the majority had lower levels of empowerment (87.3 percent) and limited capability to demand and enforce accountability (73.1 percent). The feeling of having power to influence choices; trust in health workers, government officials, and community leaders: possession of skills related to finance and health care: and the capacity to obtain, analyse, and understand financial and health related information were significantly associated with the capability to enforce accountability. However, gender, education, employment status, and occupation were found to have significant influence on the variation in the capability. Married males in the young-adult age with average rural household income, employed and having higher education were more likely to have the capability to enforce accountability. Principal component analysis results revealed that building mutual trust, increasing power and confidence of community members, adequate availability and utility of relevant and simplified information, and improving skills related to financial and health service monitoring could enhance the capability to demand and enforce accountability. The findings also revealed the existence of a gap between the formal guidelines and actual operations of both the community health fund and health facility governance committees community-level participation in the community health fund is limited to mobilisation, contribution , and accessing contribution updates through notice board. Health facility governance committees have limited autonomy to make financial and purchase decisions. While the district council exercises more control over allocation and purchase decisions. Delay in decisions result in persistent stock-outs of medicine and medical items, which cause mistrust from communities and thus limit the readiness to contribute and monitor resourcesen_US
dc.identifier.citationDamian, R. S. (2018) Community empowerment and accountability in rural primary health care The case of Kasulu District in Tanzania,Doctorial dissertation, University of Dar es Salaam, Dar es Salaam.en_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://41.86.172.12:8090/xmlui/handle/123456789/16616
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherUniversity of Dar es salaamen_US
dc.subjectPrimary health careen_US
dc.subjectCommunity health care serviceen_US
dc.subjectRural health careen_US
dc.subjectKasulu districten_US
dc.subjectTanzaniaen_US
dc.titleCommunity empowerment and accountability in rural primary health care The case of Kasulu District in Tanzaniaen_US
dc.typeThesisen_US
Files
Collections