Repository logo
  • English
  • Català
  • ÄŒeÅ¡tina
  • Deutsch
  • Español
  • Français
  • Gàidhlig
  • Italiano
  • LatvieÅ¡u
  • Magyar
  • Nederlands
  • Polski
  • Português
  • Português do Brasil
  • Srpski (lat)
  • Suomi
  • Svenska
  • Türkçe
  • Tiếng Việt
  • Log In
    New user? Click here to register. Have you forgotten your password?
Repository logo
    Communities & Collections
    All of DSpace
  • English
  • Català
  • ÄŒeÅ¡tina
  • Deutsch
  • Español
  • Français
  • Gàidhlig
  • Italiano
  • LatvieÅ¡u
  • Magyar
  • Nederlands
  • Polski
  • Português
  • Português do Brasil
  • Srpski (lat)
  • Suomi
  • Svenska
  • Türkçe
  • Tiếng Việt
  • Log In
    New user? Click here to register. Have you forgotten your password?
  1. Home
  2. Browse by Author

Browsing by Author "Kimaro, Nathalia Philip"

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Results Per Page
Sort Options
  • No Thumbnail Available
    Item
    Problems of sentencing in Tanzania: a case study of Dar es Salaam magistrates' courts
    (University of Dar es Salaam, 1990) Kimaro, Nathalia Philip
    The Tanzania penal system offers a variety of sentences which can be imposed on a convicted offender. However, the choice of which sentence and the assessment (where there is need) thereof is a difficult task. The difficulty comes in because there is a lacuna in the law of sentencing. The Law does not provide sufficient guidance on how the courts should proceed with sentencing. The only guidance provided by the law is the provision for prior receipt of evidence to enable a judge or magistrate pass a proper sentence discretion. The other attempt made to control sentencing through legislation has been to fix the maximum and in some offences, the minimum sentences. The jurisdictional limits of the courts has also been set by the law. Apart from the above controls, sentencing has been left entirely on the judges and magistrates. Consequently, the choice and assessment of sentences to be imposed is made on the basis of the judges and magistrates own subjective tests. This has resulted in great variations in sentences of the same or similar offences. The problem is further enhanced because the present penal system is not of our own indigenous growth. It was superimposed by the colonialists. The sentences are therefore alien to this country. Besides, there is no agreement on what objective should be served by punishment. At official level sentences are being justified as reformative while in the courts they are being justified as either retributive or deterrent. But to the judge or magistrate, whether it is reformation or retribution or deterrence which is being stressed, the problem is to choose and assess sentences which will serve any of the mentioned objectives because no studies have been carried out to test and ascertain which sentences can better serve any of the above objectives. The introduction of a tariff system through minimum sentences has also not solved the problem

About Library

The University of Dar es Salaam Library is a vital source of scholarly information that facilitates users to get access to learning and research resources during their studies. It provides access to a wide range of resources in both print and digital formats and conducive reading environment for users, regardless of their physical conditions. All registered users are eligible to access library resources and can borrow print materials from general shelves for a specific period of time.

Useful Links

Koha Staff Login

University Research Repository

WebMail

Aris

Book Study Room

Mara Oral History

Hansard

SOCIAL MEDIA

Instagram

Facebook

Twitter

YouTube

WhatsApp

Ask Librarian

Contact Us

Postal Address
P.O.Box 35092
Dar es Salaam

Call Us: +255 22 2410500/9 Ext. 2165 ; Direct line +255 22 2410241

Fax No:: +255 22 2410241

Email:: directorlibrary@udsm.ac.tz

2025 University of Dar es Salaam - University Of Dar Es Salaam Library
Term of use / Privacy Policy